The wise Jesuit


I cannot recall ever having been present in a congregation that greeted a sermon by a Catholic priest with more deserving spontaneous applause, not in England at least.

But applause was what Fr William Pearsall the Jesuit priest at the Church of the Immaculate Conception, Farm Street got this Sunday after speaking with sensitivity and wisdom about the upcoming Papal visit.

Fr William began by telling us how a day earlier he had opened his office window and listened to the raucous song emanating from nearby Hyde Park. He heard the sound of a large crowd delivering a passionate rendition of  Rule Brittania followed by God Save the Queen.

His first reaction was an apprehensive one. Were these the strains emanating from some extreme nationalist faction, still worse the early stirring of the anti-brigade, preparing themselves to confront the visit later this week of Pope Benedict XV1?

Was this a prejudiced identification of Britishness of the kind that for centuries had excluded a Catholic minority from the mainstream of public life on the basis that a Catholic’s loyalties   were not be trusted?

Back in 1780 thousands heeded the call of Lord George Gordon, the head of the Protestant Association, and took to the streets of London in an outburst of anti-Catholic feeling. The so-called Gordon riots, prompted by the repeal of the more extreme laws discriminating against Roman Catholics in the UK,  led to the ransacking of churches and Catholics homes. Over 280 rioters were shot dead when the army intervened. This was the Age of Enlightenment, the ‘age of tolerance’ and yet this went down in the history books as the most destructive uprising to take place in the English capital in the 18th century.

Fr William checked the Hyde Park gathering and discovered that it was the last night of the Proms,  a musical celebration with no threat, implicit or otherwise to Catholics who had an inclusive sense of their Britishness, which cut across class and race and partisan politics.

 

He recalled then how prior to becoming a priest, as a younger man, he had been an atheist. For him four words had summed up all that could go wrong with the human race on account of religion: superstition, fear, bigotry, and ignorance.  He was to learn later what he now knows that the worst manifestations of all four lie outside religion, not within.

Which is why he was asking his fellow parishioners to look forward to the papal visit from a position not of defensiveness but of affirmation. Their ethnicity was one that could reach out to others, rather than seek to impose itself in a militaristic or triumphalist manner.

Against those who sought to denigrate the figure of the Pope, with an oedipal rejection of the Father figure, the Papa, Catholics could draw energy and inspiration from the foundation of the Christian Church with the words of Christ telling his unconditionally loyal, and very human apostle, ‘Thou art Peter, and upon this Rock I shall build my Church and the gates of hell shall not prevail against thee.’

Catholics have endured history. Not even a million twitters of anti-Popery should be allowed to spoil the good that can come from the Pope’s visit. Fr William’s prayer was that, like the prodigal son, those who thought themselves dead, will come alive later this week, not in superstition, fear, bigotry and ignorance, but in love based on substantive thought. Amen to that.

This entry was posted in Religion. Bookmark the permalink.


Comments

  1. Martin Newman says:

    Jimmy – I love you but I refuse to let a friend get away with this lukefarm bathwater in which you’ve slit your intellectual wrists – even at the risk of being one of those million negative twitterers. The good that could possibly come from this (untimely, hyped, mismanaged and absurdly burdensome on a crippled taxpayer) visit would be the good that always can come from the confrontation of dilemma: should Christians(puh-leeze leave the tribal sub-brand sensitivities to one side along with the odd notion that we’re talking here about an ‘ethnic’ group)evolve in their world views or not? Vatican 2 says yes. Two subsequent bishops of Rome say no. Substantive thought required.

    • Jimmy Burns says:

      Well Martin…there is some subtantive thought going on at my former employer which has never had a religious affairs correspondent but still manages to generate some interesting views on Popery, anti and otherwise. I have just had this one emailed to me by a friendly MP Denis MacShane who comments on Stephen Wall’s comment in the FT.
      “‘An unelected, hierarchical, chauvinist autarchy bent on conserving its own power.’ As I read Sir Stephen Wall’s words I assumed he was talking about Whitehall but apparently it is the Catholic Church he is describing. All the major religions in the world seem to be in trouble and in need of reform in terms of their political and social outlook. But in the heat generated over Benedict’s visit there is a strong whiff of the “No Popery” of old. “

  2. Martin Newman says:

    I saw the Wall piece – and love your bitchy anti-Whitehall aside. On the bigger question, in one sense I think you’re bang on the money – tho to my mind it’s not so much ‘no Popery’ fullstop as ‘let’s have none of this particular brand of Popery which does itself, religion and the world so very few favours’. I know that there are thoughtful citizens, who believe faith has an important contribution to make, praying now for a different kind of voice to be heard than that of PapaRatzi.

  3. David Burns says:

    …suggest you read Polly Toynbee in today’s Guardian.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *